<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Forum | China Boxer</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/?group=14</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Chinese Boxing Tutorial]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Forum Version 4.1.0</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/?group=14&#038;xfeed=group" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>whatrevolution on "The Wing Chun Mind: Learn to Think Like a True Fighter"</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/the-wing-chun-mind-learn-to-think-like-a-true-fighter/#p1236</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/the-wing-chun-mind-learn-to-think-like-a-true-fighter/#p1236</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>While doing some Wikipedia editing in the JKD article, I wanted to know the oldest and most legitimate source for this republished article by Robert Chu.&#160; With a bit of GoogleFu, I found it <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview(&#39;/outgoing/www.hawkinscheung.com/html/wcarticle.htm&#39;);" href="http://www.hawkinscheung.com/html/wcarticle.htm" target="_blank" target="_blank">on Hawkins Cheung&#39;s own website</a>, and it includes citation for the original publication. ^_^</p>
<br />
<p>The one pasted to this thread shows hyperlink to wingchunonline.com, who republished the text around the same time as hawkinscheung.com, but wingchunonline and a litany of other sites (who are probably just copy/pastes of the wingchunonline text) are milking this text for search engine rank, without citation to the original publisher, "Inside Kung-Fu".</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Tenchu on Science and Bruce Lee's Philosophy</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/science-and-bruce-lees-philosophy/#p1102</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/science-and-bruce-lees-philosophy/#p1102</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I liked the first paragraph and the last sentence. The rest sounded like you were slightly lost (no disrespect).</p>
<br />
<p>I believe the same sort of thing. Although I&#39;m not Buddhist, I follow the pentagram idea somewhat, which is more directly related to this than basic Buddhism is.</p>
<br />
<p>The pentagram is the star with five points surrounded by a circle. The cricle is the wheel of life, the lines of the star is the cycle of destruction. The five elements, following the wheel of life, are, Void, Fire, Earth, Air, Water.</p>
<br />
<p>The fifth/first element, Void, is difficult to comprehend. As Musashi put it, "It is not included in mans knowledge." Put simply, the brain/body is constructed of entirely physical things (the other four elements). Thus, the brain cannot comprehend the Void because it&#39;s not created of it in any way. You could say a person comprehending the Void is as silly as a robot thinking he&#39;s a real living person. It&#39;s the same idea.</p>
<p>I think Bruce Lee said about the Void, "Do not name it."</p>
<br />
<p>My view of the Void, though to hold a view on this subject perhaps is to admit you&#39;re a mislead fool, though I&#39;d still put it roughly to be something along the lines of the essence of existence. In that sense, it&#39;s life. The pentagram clearly states water creates the next step, thus it&#39;s safe to assume water is creating life. Though what we cannot claim to know is exactley what life is. Although we may be it (life), our CPU, our brain, is not.</p>
<br />
<p>So I agree with you; I do not think the Void can be sliced and seperated. I do not believe there truly is such thing as an individual in the greater sense, and there&#39;s no such thing as I. In this understanding, there&#39;s also no real birth or death, either. There just "is".</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Tripartite on Ego</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/ego/#p867</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/ego/#p867</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Ahh I love this post!&#160; Huge tool fan lol
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Jin on Science and Bruce Lee's Philosophy</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/science-and-bruce-lees-philosophy/#p849</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/science-and-bruce-lees-philosophy/#p849</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[that&#39;s alot to think about, great stuff! let me think about this a bit..
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Tripartite on Science and Bruce Lee's Philosophy</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/science-and-bruce-lees-philosophy/#p847</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/science-and-bruce-lees-philosophy/#p847</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys this is just a random thought but I was thinking about the relation between science (more accurately, physics) and the philosophy of Bruce Lee (adapted from Buddhist principles of course).&#160; This became evident in the film &#39;Enter the Dragon&#39; when his master questioned him about his opponent and Mr. Lee responded something saying that there is no opponent because the word &#39;I&#39; does not exist..What I am getting at is what is central to this mode of thought is that from Bruce Lee&#39;s perspective (well, a Buddhist perspective) all things in the universe are connected together and it is really our own subjective realities and our minds that create the illusion of being distinctive with the rest of the universe since we interact and depend upon it to exist.&#160;&#160;</p>
<p>Science goes hand in hand.. particularly physics/chemistry when we go to think of the Law of Thermodynamics that states that energy is not created nor destroyed but is converted into different forms and continues travelling.&#160; So from a martial arts perspective we do a parry or a block diverting the energy and absorbing some of the impact.&#160; On a smaller level, there is an exchange of heat energy and other forces and the air we breathe in and out enters within our bloodstream, etc., and so movements are happening &#39;through&#39; us, even though we tend to have the common misconception that it is simply &#39;US&#39; doing the movement, since energy is universal and we are merely sharing it with all other things (we learn this especially from sensitivity drills done in filipino arts and wing chun).&#160; This goes back to what was said earlier because of our subjective reality we tend to think of &#39;US&#39; versus &#39;ENEMY&#39; and is an old adaptational disposition within our neurology.&#160; To get back to the quote, we are dependant upon the interaction with the universe for our own existence, and an enemy or opponent can not exist because they are merely completing movements dictated by scientific laws and universal energy.&#160; This mode of thought can be a useful tool for understanding conflict and mental preparation for a competitive fight or if a self defense altercation ever occurs, using this mental framework can help control our nerves that have been wired to benefit our chances of survival in the past.&#160; - Rob</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Rocknroller on Turning other cheek</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/turning-other-cheek/#p828</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/turning-other-cheek/#p828</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>My friend, will you excuse me, I cannot consider giving our own&#160;sneaky interpretations right to what was said&#160;at that ancient time. Instead of it&#160;understanding it straightly and trying to find a way for that Word to govern our actual behaviour.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>thebruceleefan on Ego</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/ego/#p790</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/ego/#p790</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160; in the same way that we can not own possesions we can not own knowlage one can never realy own any thing because in as much as we possess objects they allso possess us if&#160;we want to have some thing nice&#160;we must care for it and protect it and in this way&#160;we surve it because of this the object actualy owns us and if we neglect our dutys/the object it quickly deteariates and becomes worthless we no longer own it you care for knowlage by using it and sharing it if you do use youre knowlage and make it grow it to will deteariates and becomes nothing&#160;&#160;
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>thebruceleefan on Bushido Wisdom</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/bushido-wisdom/#p789</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/bushido-wisdom/#p789</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[while we are on musashi miomoto the book of five ring on crossing th revean is a very important consept for martial artest
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>thebruceleefan on mind and body</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/mind-and-body/#p772</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/mind-and-body/#p772</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[&#160;dos the strength of man lie in his body or in his mind ?&#160; A neglected mind leads to a neglected body ultimately it means that the whole becomes weak and feable because of neglect. A neglected body leads to a neglected mind again ultimatley the whol becomes weak and feable do to neglect so realy the answer is bothe the mind and the body travel together if a man wants to be strong he must allso become wise and a man who wishes to be wise should become strong "strong in this case means&#160;natural healthy strangth not like body building althouugh the same principal can apply becaus body builders need to know alot to make it work for them"
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>thebruceleefan on Turning other cheek</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/turning-other-cheek/#p768</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/turning-other-cheek/#p768</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[&#160;turning the other cheak is targeted more toword forgivness to an offront of youre faculties "he/she insulted not assulted you" forgive arrogance or ignorance or unthaghtfulness if a man strikes you his intent is to harm you protect your self with out mallice I say ptotect not defend because I think of it as the differance of defending an area or protecting youre family
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>thebruceleefan on the art of war</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/the-art-of-war/#p767</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/the-art-of-war/#p767</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>ultimatley all knowlage is self knowlage their for the more you understand others the more you can understand youre self. the knowlage of self extends to all aspects of the martial artes life he understands his body therw long years of training and hard practice understands his motivations thew examination of his life understands intent the observation of his motive and it dosent stop their</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>thebruceleefan on Good Training = Good Character ??</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/good-training-good-character/#p766</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/good-training-good-character/#p766</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[&#160;usually when you take martial arts some sort of other mentle training is included like tai kwan do and american kick boxing teach alot about sportsmenship and team playong as well as basic disaplin shao lin boxing teaches a lot of buddest conceopt in the training&#160; so usually it leads to a better over all person it is possable to traine the body with out the mind its just very difficult so yes martial arts should be used for some thing posotive
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>tuma on Good Training = Good Character ??</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/good-training-good-character/#p752</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/good-training-good-character/#p752</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<br />
<p>I&#180;d like to share my views of martial arts. I think martial arts has to use for something positive, not for something bad. Like my master used to say: "Good training produces good character, bad training produces bad character".</p>
<br />
<p>What do you think about that ? Is it that easy ?</p>
<p>Like physical and mental is one, mental state is a reflaction of the physical conidition ?</p>
<p>So therefor, do I have to controll my physical behavior to let my mental be better ?</p>
<p>And what&#160;means correct physical moving for the martial arts to be also a better human being ?</p>
<br />
<p>Greetings to Sifu Jin from Germany</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Erikthered on Bushido Wisdom</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/bushido-wisdom/#p677</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/bushido-wisdom/#p677</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[I love this topic...it has long been my belief that Bushido, or the Way of the Warrior, was simply one in which the adherent, in the decision making process for <em>any</em> decision, simply never allows fear (all fears lead to the fear of death) to influence their choice or resolve to follow that choice with right action...
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>archers10 on "The Wing Chun Mind: Learn to Think Like a True Fighter"</title>
	<link>http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/the-wing-chun-mind-learn-to-think-like-a-true-fighter/#p672</link>
	<category>Philosophy Discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.thechinaboxer.com/forum/philosphy/the-wing-chun-mind-learn-to-think-like-a-true-fighter/#p672</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[thanks for sharing Aletifer! great article nice:)
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>